Empathy for others' suffering and its mediators in mental health professionals.

Empathy is a complex cognitive and affective process that allows humans to experience concern for others, comprehend their emotions, and eventually help them. In addition to studies with healthy subjects and various neuropsychiatric populations, a few reports have examined this domain focusing on mental health workers, whose daily work requires the development of a saliently empathic character. Building on this research line, the present population-based study aimed to (a) assess different dimensions of empathy for pain in mental health workers relative to general-physicians and non-medical workers; and (b) evaluate their relationship with relevant factors, such as moral profile, age, gender, years of experience, and workplace type. Relative to both control groups, mental health workers exhibited higher empathic concern and discomfort for others' suffering, and they favored harsher punishment to harmful actions. Furthermore, this was the only group in which empathy variability was explained by moral judgments, years of experience, and workplace type. Taken together, these results indicate that empathy is continuously at stake in mental health care scenarios, as it can be affected by contextual factors and social contingencies. More generally, they highlight the importance of studying this domain in populations characterized by extreme empathic demands.

Men, women who cares? A population-based study on sex differences and gender roles in empathy and moral cognition.

Research on sex differences in empathy has revealed mixed findings. Whereas experimental and neuropsychological measures show no consistent sex effect, self-report data consistently indicates greater empathy in women. However, available results mainly come from separate populations with relatively small samples, which may inflate effect sizes and hinder comparability between both empirical corpora. To elucidate the issue, we conducted two large-scale studies. First, we examined whether sex differences emerge in a large population-based sample (n = 10,802) when empathy is measured with an experimental empathy-for-pain paradigm. Moreover, we investigated the relationship between empathy and moral judgment. In the second study, a subsample (n = 334) completed a self-report empathy questionnaire. Results showed some sex differences in the experimental paradigm, but with minuscule effect sizes. Conversely, women did portray themselves as more empathic through self-reports. In addition, utilitarian responses to moral dilemmas were less frequent in women, although these differences also had small effect sizes. These findings suggest that sex differences in empathy are highly driven by the assessment measure. In particular, self-reports may induce biases leading individuals to assume gender-role stereotypes. Awareness of the role of measurement instruments in this field may hone our understanding of the links between empathy, sex differences, and gender roles.

Relatives' Presence During Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation.

BACKGROUND: The question of whether or not to allow family to be present during resuscitation is relevant to everyday professional health care assistance, but it remains largely unexplored in the medical literature. OBJECTIVES: We conducted an online survey with the aim of increasing our knowledge and understanding of this issue. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional, multicenter, descriptive, national, and international study using a web-based, voluntary survey. The survey was designed and distributed through a medical website in Spanish, targeting physicians who frequently deal with critical patients. RESULTS: A total of 1,286 Argentine physicians and 1,848 physicians from other countries responded to this voluntary survey. Of Argentine respondents, 15.8% (203) treat only children, 68.2% (877) treat adults, and 16% (206) treat patients of any age. The survey found that 23% (296) of Argentine and 20% of other respondents favor the presence of family members during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (p = 0.03). This practice was more common among physicians treating pediatric and neonatal patients than among those who treat adults. The most commonly reported reason (21.8%) for avoiding the presence of relatives was concerns that physicians, communications, and medical practices might be misunderstood or misinterpreted. CONCLUSIONS: Avoiding relatives' presence while performing cardiopulmonary resuscitation is the most frequent choice made by the surveyed physicians who treat critical Argentine patients. The main causes for discouraging family presence during cardiopulmonary resuscitation or other critical procedures include the following: risk of misinterpretation of the physician's actions and/or words; risk of a relative's decompensation; uncertainty about possible reactions; and interpretation of the relative's presence as negative.

Agresiones hacia profesionales en el ámbito de la salud / Assaults on professionals in healthcare settings

Objetivo. Determinar la frecuencia de agresiones al personal sanitario en una red social de profesionales de la salud y caracterizar aspectos que profundicen su comprensión y el desarrollo de estrategias de prevención. Métodos. Se realizó una encuesta electrónica voluntaria y confidencial a través del sitio web IntraMed. Se analizó la frecuencia de agresiones verbales y físicas y su asociación con variables demográficas, ocupación, carrera, especialidad, eventuales consecuencias, percepción de inseguridad en el lugar de trabajo y propuestas para reducirla. Resultados. Se analizaron 19 967 encuestas. En 13 323 (66,7%), se refirieron agresiones. El 11,3% de las agresiones fueron físicas. El 73,4% ocurrieron en instituciones públicas, principalmente en áreas de emergencia. Los desencadenantes más frecuentes fueron la demora en la atención y la carencia de recursos. Se informó, en los agresores, intoxicación por alcohol o drogas en 13,8%, estado mental alterado por otra causa o enfermedad psiquiátrica en 13,9%, y en 63% no se detectó alteración de las facultades mentales. En 16,9% de los casos se informaron secuelas en los profesionales agredidos, en 7,9% secuelas físicas y en 28% de los lesionados suspensión temporaria de la actividad laboral. En 46,6% se refirió inseguridad en el lugar de trabajo y se sugirieron diversas medidas para reducirla, entre las que se destacó la educación comunitaria. Conclusiones. La violencia verbal o física hacia el personal de la salud resultó frecuente, con la consecuencia de secuelas laborales, psíquicas e incluso físicas. La información aportada por este estudio podría utilizarse para desarrollar estrategias orientadas a su prevención y control.

Objective. Determine the frequency of assaults on health workers and characterize aspects that deepen understanding and development of prevention strategies. Methods. A voluntary and confidential electronic survey was conducted through the IntraMed website, a social network of health professionals. Frequency of verbal and physical assaults was analyzed along with their association with demographic variables, occupation, career, specialty, potential consequences, perception of insecurity in the workplace, and proposals to reduce them. Results. A total of 19 967 surveys were analyzed, of which 13 323 (66.7%) described assaults. Assaults were physical in 11.3% of cases, and 73.4% occurred in public institutions, mainly in emergency areas. Delay in care and lack of resources were the most frequent triggers. Alcohol or drug intoxication was reported in 13.8% of aggressors, altered mental status from another cause or psychiatric illness in 13.9%, and no detected impairment of mental faculties in 63%. Of professionals attacked, 16.9% reported sequelae, 7.9% of which were physical, and 28% were temporarily unable to work. Insecurity in the workplace was described by 46.6% of respondents, who suggested various measures to reduce it, chief among them, community education Conclusions. Verbal and physical violence toward health workers was frequent, resulting in work-related, mental, and even physical sequelae. This study contributes information that could be used to develop strategies aimed at prevention and control of assaults.

Agresiones hacia profesionales en el ámbito de la salud / Assaults on professionals in healthcare settings

OBJETIVO: Determinar la frecuencia de agresiones al personal sanitario en una red social de profesionales de la salud y caracterizar aspectos que profundicen su comprensión y el desarrollo de estrategias de prevención. MÉTODOS: Se realizó una encuesta electrónica voluntaria y confidencial a través del sitio web IntraMed. Se analizó la frecuencia de agresiones verbales y físicas y su asociación con variables demográficas, ocupación, carrera, especialidad, eventuales consecuencias, percepción de inseguridad en el lugar de trabajo y propuestas para reducirla. RESULTADOS: Se analizaron 19 967 encuestas. En 13 323 (66,7%), se refirieron agresiones. El 11,3% de las agresiones fueron físicas. El 73,4% ocurrieron en instituciones públicas, principalmente en áreas de emergencia. Los desencadenantes más frecuentes fueron la demora en la atención y la carencia de recursos. Se informó, en los agresores, intoxicación por alcohol o drogas en 13,8%, estado mental alterado por otra causa o enfermedad psiquiátrica en 13,9%, y en 63% no se detectó alteración de las facultades mentales. En 16,9% de los casos se informaron secuelas en los profesionales agredidos, en 7,9% secuelas físicas y en 28% de los lesionados suspensión temporaria de la actividad laboral. En 46,6% se refirió inseguridad en el lugar de trabajo y se sugirieron diversas medidas para reducirla, entre las que se destacó la educación comunitaria. CONCLUSIONES: La violencia verbal o física hacia el personal de la salud resultó frecuente, con la consecuencia de secuelas laborales, psíquicas e incluso físicas. La información aportada por este estudio podría utilizarse para desarrollar estrategias orientadas a su prevención y control.

OBJECTIVE: Determine the frequency of assaults on health workers and characterize aspects that deepen understanding and development of prevention strategies. METHODS: A voluntary and confidential electronic survey was conducted through the IntraMed website, a social network of health professionals. Frequency of verbal and physical assaults was analyzed along with their association with demographic variables, occupation, career, specialty, potential consequences, perception of insecurity in the workplace, and proposals to reduce them. RESULTS: A total of 19 967 surveys were analyzed, of which 13 323 (66.7%) described assaults. Assaults were physical in 11.3% of cases, and 73.4% occurred in public institutions, mainly in emergency areas. Delay in care and lack of resources were the most frequent triggers. Alcohol or drug intoxication was reported in 13.8% of aggressors, altered mental status from another cause or psychiatric illness in 13.9%, and no detected impairment of mental faculties in 63%. Of professionals attacked, 16.9% reported sequelae, 7.9% of which were physical, and 28% were temporarily unable to work. Insecurity in the workplace was described by 46.6% of respondents, who suggested various measures to reduce it, chief among them, community education CONCLUSIONS: Verbal and physical violence toward health workers was frequent, resulting in work-related, mental, and even physical sequelae. This study contributes information that could be used to develop strategies aimed at prevention and control of assaults.

Estrategias de educación médica continua / Continuing medical education strategies

Para ejercer apropiadamente a lo largo de su vida profesional, los médicos han de involucrarse en alguna forma de educación continua. La educación médica continua no se limita a la educación formal desarrollada mediante tal o cual método educativo, sino que comprende experiencias de muy diversa índole, formales e informales, tales como los encuentros con colegas, el autoaprendizaje y la educación a distancia. El propósito de esta publicación es presentar los resultados obtenidos al explorar las estrategias y recursos mas frecuentemente utilizados por los profesionales médicos para mantenerse actualizados. Se implementó una encuesta electrónica de cinco preguntas cerradas con varias opciones de respuesta. Las preguntas indagaban sobre: lugar de trabajo, frecuencia con la que experimenta ‘necesidad’ de actualizar sus conocimientos, modalidades y recursos utilizados. Se obtuvieron 9.851 respuestas. Las modalidades más frecuentemente mencionadas fueron asistencia a cursos presenciales, a congresos y seminarios, y participación en actividades hospitalarias. Las revistas publicadas por sociedades científicas y las guías clínicas son las fuentes de información señaladas con mayor frecuencia. Los recursos disponibles en Internet fueron mencionados por menos del 20% de los profesionales que respondieron. Se encontraron algunas diferencias entre las modalidades y recursos que utilizan los médicos que trabajan sólo en su consulta y los que atienden en un hospital

To properly exercise throughout his professional life, doctors have to engage in some form of continuing education. Continuing medical education is not limited to formal education, includes very diverse experiences, formal and informal such as meetings with colleagues, self-learning and distance education. The purpose of this paper is to present the results to explore strategies and resources used by medical professionals to keep up to date. Implemented an electronic survey of 5 questions with several response options; explored questions about: workplace, frequency experiences ‘need’ to update their medical knowledge, methods and resources used more frequently. 9.851 answers were obtained. The most frequently mentioned modalities were assistance to courses, conferences and seminars and participating in activities in the hospital. Journals published by scientific societies and clinical guidelines are information sources referred to most frequently. The resources available on the internet were mentioned by less than 20% of the professionals who responded. There are some differences between the methods and resources used by doctors who work only in their offices and those who attend at hospital

[Assaults on professionals in healthcare settings]. / Agresiones hacia profesionales en el ámbito de la salud.

OBJECTIVE: Determine the frequency of assaults on health workers and characterize aspects that deepen understanding and development of prevention strategies. METHODS: A voluntary and confidential electronic survey was conducted through the IntraMed website, a social network of health professionals. Frequency of verbal and physical assaults was analyzed along with their association with demographic variables, occupation, career, specialty, potential consequences, perception of insecurity in the workplace, and proposals to reduce them. RESULTS: A total of 19 967 surveys were analyzed, of which 13 323 (66.7%) described assaults. Assaults were physical in 11.3% of cases, and 73.4% occurred in public institutions, mainly in emergency areas. Delay in care and lack of resources were the most frequent triggers. Alcohol or drug intoxication was reported in 13.8% of aggressors, altered mental status from another cause or psychiatric illness in 13.9%, and no detected impairment of mental faculties in 63%. Of professionals attacked, 16.9% reported sequelae, 7.9% of which were physical, and 28% were temporarily unable to work. Insecurity in the workplace was described by 46.6% of respondents, who suggested various measures to reduce it, chief among them, community education CONCLUSIONS: Verbal and physical violence toward health workers was frequent, resulting in work-related, mental, and even physical sequelae. This study contributes information that could be used to develop strategies aimed at prevention and control of assaults.

Psychiatrists' approach to vascular risk assessment in Latin America.

AIM: To explore the way in which Latin American psychiatrists approach the screening of vascular risk factors in patients receiving antipsychotic medication. METHODS: This was a descriptive, cross sectional study that surveyed Latin-American physicians to evaluate differences between groups divided in three main sections. The first section included demographic and professional data. The second section asked about the available medical resources: weighing scales, sphygmomanometer and measuring tape. Finally, the third section aimed at looking into the attitudes towards cardiovascular prevention. The latter was also divided into two subsections. In the first one, the questions were about weight, blood pressure and waist perimeter. In the second subsection the questions asked about the proportion of patients: (1) that suffered from overweight and/or obesity; (2) whose lipids and glycemia were controlled by the physician; (3) that were questioned by, and received information from the physician about smoking; and (4) that received recommendations from the physician to engage in regular physical activity. The participants were physicians, users of the medical website Intramed. The visitors were recruited by a banner that invited them to voluntarily access an online self-reported structured questionnaire with multiple options. RESULTS: We surveyed 1185 general physicians and 792 psychiatrists. Regarding basic medical resources, a significantly higher proportion of general physicians claimed to have weighing scales (χ(2) = 404.9; P < 0.001), sphygmomanometers (χ(2) = 419.3; P < 0.001), and measuring tapes (χ(2) = 336.5; P < 0.001). While general physicians measured overweight and metabolic indexes in the general population in a higher proportion than in patients treated with antipsychotics (Z = -11.91; P < 0.001), psychiatrists claimed to measure them in patients medicated with antipsychotics in a higher proportion than in the general population (Z = -3.26; P < 0.001). Also general physicians tended to evaluate smoking habits in the general population more than psychiatrists (Z = -7.02; P < 0.001), but psychiatrists evaluated smoking habits in patients medicated with antipsychotics more than general physicians did (Z = -2.25; P = 0.024). General physicians showed a significantly higher tendency to control blood pressure (χ(2) = 334.987; P < 0.001), weight (χ(2) = 435.636; P < 0.001) and waist perimeter (χ(2) = 96.52; P < 0.001) themselves and they did so in all patients. General physicians suggested physical activity to all patients more frequently (Z = -2.23; P = 0.026), but psychiatrists recommended physical activity to patients medicated with antipsychotics more frequently (Z = -7.53; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Psychiatrists usually check vascular risk factors in their patients, especially in those taking antipsychotics. General practitioners check them routinely without paying special attention to this population.